2 min read

Multan Sultans still waiting as PCB issues fresh ten-year renewals to other PSL teams

Multan Sultans stand alone this week: every other Pakistan Super League franchise has already received a ten-year renewal offer from the Pakistan Cricket Board, yet no letter has landed at Ali Tareen’s door.

A PCB spokesperson confirmed on Friday that “renewal offers, together with revised franchise fees, have been sent to all compliant PSL franchises”. Representatives from Lahore, Karachi, Quetta, Islamabad and Peshawar have privately acknowledged receipt. A Sultans official, by contrast, told reporters the inbox remained empty.

The omission feels pointed rather than clerical. Relations between Tareen and league administrators have been strained for months. In February, the Sultans owner accused the PSL hierarchy of poor communication and “a lack of transparency”. The board fired back with a show-cause notice threatening to blacklist him unless he apologised.

Tareen duly posted a tongue-in-cheek video in which he said he was sorry for “wanting to make the PSL better”, before tearing up the document on camera. The PCB never accepted that as a genuine apology and now appears to be pressing its compliance clause.

The mechanics of renewal are simple enough. Every current franchise holds a right of first refusal; reply within ten days, pay the new fee, keep the team for another decade. The catch is cost. Several owners say the annual figure rises by at least 25 per cent, and could be higher once updated valuations are agreed.

One senior executive from a rival club put it bluntly: “We knew fees would jump, but the real surprise is leaving Multan out at this stage.” Another owner, requesting anonymity, described the move as “a clear message on governance”.

While that drama unfolds, the league is expanding. The PCB has opened bids for two additional teams, short-listing Hyderabad, Sialkot, Muzaffarabad, Faisalabad, Gilgit and Rawalpindi. An eight-team competition is pencilled in for April–May next year, assuming dates do not clash with the congested global calendar.

The practical implications for Sultans are uncertain. Without a renewal offer they cannot exercise first refusal, leaving the franchise in limbo. Should the board ultimately deem Tareen non-compliant, Multan’s rights would revert to the PCB and be put back on the market.

For now, both sides are keeping public comments to a minimum. The PCB declined to say whether a formal block has been placed on Tareen’s bid. The Sultans camp, meanwhile, insists it will “continue planning for the season until told otherwise”.

It is an awkward stalemate: five clubs busy checking the small print of new ten-year deals, one club wondering if it will even be invited to the same table.

About the author