Sciver-Brunt demands sharper execution after bruising Trent Bridge opener

Nat Sciver-Brunt described England’s 97-run defeat to India in Nottingham as a “wake-up call” and, truth be told, it felt exactly that. Smriti Mandhana’s thrilling 112 from 62 balls set up India’s imposing 210 for 4 before England subsided for 113, their heaviest loss in women’s T20Is. A new coaching ticket, a new captain, but the same old truth: when the basics slip, the scoreline bites.

England’s chase never found a pulse. Sophia Dunkley snicked off in the first over, Danni Wyatt was pinned leg-before soon after and, with the figures reading 17 for 2, the tone was set. Sciver-Brunt fought a lone battle, her 66 coming in 41 balls, yet she was the only top-six batter to pass 15. The next best contribution, 12 from debutant seamer-turned-pinch-hitter Em Arlott, underlined how lopsided things became.

“When a team scores 200, you’ve got to have some really good partnerships in there when you’re batting and we lost wickets early, so it made it very difficult for us,” Sciver-Brunt said. “They are obviously a world-class side with some amazing batters who, if you give a chance to, they’re going to punish you. We probably didn’t do ourselves justice in terms of the first innings so we’ll be looking to put a few things right and probably just tighten up a little bit in terms of our lines.”

Charlotte Edwards, two matches into her tenure as head coach, kept analysis measured afterwards. She pointed to the lengths bowled in the powerplay – too floaty, not enough pace-off – and noted the knock-on effect: Mandhana, already fluent, sensed freedom and anything remotely full disappeared over extra-cover. England tried seven bowlers, none escaped damage, and the fielding lacked its usual snap. A sliding stop turned four into two was applauded by the crowd, yet felt the exception rather than the rule.

“I think the plans were right, but we probably just didn’t execute so we will review honestly and make sure that we’re confident going into that second game,” Sciver-Brunt admitted.

India, captained by Mandhana with Harmanpreet Kaur nursing a shoulder niggle, were purposeful from ball one. Shafali Verma muscled an 18-ball 33 in a 77-run opening stand and, when she holed out, Harleen Deol kept her foot down with 43 off 23. Mandhana’s maiden T20 hundred arrived with a dab past short third; she raised her arms, offered a brief smile, and then slapped the next delivery flat over mid-wicket. By the interval England already looked weary.

The run-rate demanded 10.5 an over and, as Sciver-Brunt noted, one person cannot do it alone. “One person can’t win a game, so it is all about partnerships with the bat and showing our physicality as well, making sure that we’re coming back for twos and keeping that energy high,” Sciver-Brunt said. “That’s probably how we go about things the best. Everyone’s attitude I think was wanting to do that, we just didn’t execute with the bat either… When you’re chasing that you need someone to go big, but obviously some others to help around as well.”

Execution – that word again. Tammy Beaumont scratched around for 10 in a 49-run stand with her captain but never looked settled; the moment she backed away to make room and lost her middle stump felt decisive. Alice Capsey tried to counter with her customary wristy force yet steered a return catch to Pooja Vastrakar. The innings never recovered.

There will be talk about England’s “physicality”, a phrase that can sound like code for fitness standards. Under Jon Lewis the group worked hard on conditioning, yet Edwards has pushed them further, encouraging higher running volumes between the wickets and greater intensity in the outfield. Mandhana, hardly the quickest across the turf, still pinched a handful of energetic twos that frustrated England’s bowlers. Sciver-Brunt conceded as much: “Everyone’s trying their best. You can’t blame anyone that they haven’t tried or anything like that. Obviously it’d be great to get a partnership with someone and really take the game on together.”

Perspective is useful. Across the recent West Indies series England barely broke sweat, winning six from six and rattling off three chases with overs to spare. India, with a deeper batting order and spinners capable of strangling the middle overs, were always going to pose a sterner test. Yet nobody inside a sun-drenched Trent Bridge expected a margin of defeat so stark; 97 runs is a figure that lingers.

How they respond in Hove on Tuesday will tell us more about this reboot under Sciver-Brunt and Edwards than any opening-night misfire. A likely tweak is the return of Lauren Bell’s swing bowling, perhaps at the expense of Freya Davies. Hannah Jones’ left-arm spin could also come under consideration if the surface promises grip. These are tactical wrinkles, though the broader requirement is simpler: nail your lengths, hold your chances, and build proper batting partnerships.

The captain retains faith. “Everyone’s attitude is good,” she said, reinforcing that no heads dropped despite the carnage. England supporters have learned to trust Sciver-Brunt’s read on these things. Even so, the table shows India lead the five-match series 1-0, and that is a reality England must shift – quickly.

Mandhana left with the match award and an armful of camera requests; her smile suggested India feel under control. England, bruised but hardly broken, have 48 hours to clear their heads. Count-back shows their last T20I defeat of this size came against Australia four years ago – they rebounded within a week then. Do it again now, and this Trent Bridge thump will fade into lesson rather than legacy.

About the author