2 min read

ICC quietly seeks compromise after Pakistan confirms India match boycott

The International Cricket Council is working the phones behind the scenes, hoping to rescue the marquee Pakistan-India group game at next year’s T20 World Cup in Sri Lanka.

On government orders, Pakistan have said they will not walk out at Colombo on 15 February. All other fixtures remain on their schedule. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif framed the stand-off as an act of solidarity with Bangladesh, who were barred from the tournament once they refused to travel to co-host India.

The ICC responded through a short statement, saying it expected the Pakistan Cricket Board to “explore a mutually acceptable resolution, which protects the interests of all stakeholders.” Imran Khwaja, the ICC’s deputy chair, has since taken the lead in negotiations.

Khwaja and fellow board member Mubashir Usmani, head of the Emirates Cricket Board, have held regular calls with PCB chairman Mohsin Naqvi and senior adviser Salman Naseer. Naqvi had already raised doubts about Pakistan’s participation during a visit to the UAE a week before the boycott was announced, meeting Khwaja in person to gauge potential fallout.

Initially, cricket’s governing body outlined the sanctions that could follow a complete withdrawal. PCB officials, however, insisted money is not the sticking point. “The issue is principle, not penalties,” one administrator told me yesterday.

Tension intensified once Bangladesh were formally excluded. Naqvi accused the ICC of “double standards” and described the decision as an “injustice” to a fellow Full Member. That broadside set alarm bells ringing at headquarters; the Pakistan-India fixture is the tournament’s commercial engine.

Contact has since shifted from threats to bridge-building. Khwaja, who has mediated previous disputes between the PCB and India’s board, is again acting as go-between. One proposal floated privately involves moving the match to a neutral venue—Dubai is the obvious candidate—though there is no sign yet that either government will soften its stance.

Pakistan captain Saud Agha, caught between politics and a World Cup he desperately wants to play, sounded weary when asked about the boycott. “Not our decision, we can’t do anything,” he said on the team’s training camp in Lahore. “We’ll do whatever the government and the PCB tell us to do.”

From a cricket perspective, forfeiting the India game would almost certainly sink Pakistan’s hopes of topping the group. Worse, it risks setting a precedent for politically driven withdrawals at ICC events. For the governing body, the challenge is to protect both its flagship fixture and the principle of teams settling matters on the field.

Resolving that equation will require diplomatic footwork rather than public statements, so expect more hushed calls across time zones over the coming weeks. As one ICC insider put it, “There’s still time on the clock—just not as much as everyone would like.”

About the author